Intelligence vs Consciousness: Will AI Agents Ever Attain Human Attributes?

What is the difference between intelligence and consciousness? As AI agents becoming more intelligent and some are even going rogue, can they attain consciousness like human beings? To answer this question, it is important to define "intelligence" and "consciousness". 

Yuval Harari on Intelligence vs Consciousness


Israeli public intellectual Yuval Harari defines Intelligence as the capacity to pursue and achieve material goals, while consciousness is the ability to feel pain, joy, love, and suffering. For example, AI can win chess games or process data without experiencing any feelings or emotional states. AI can also convincingly imitate emotions to build deep personal relationships, even though it remains entirely devoid of consciousness. What distinguishes humans from artificial intelligence is that consciousness and intelligence go together in humans. In interview with Economist magazine's chief editor Zanny Minton Beddoes, Harari said the following: 

"Now, maybe the most important distinction to be made, first of all, is between intelligence and consciousness. What is consciousness? How is it different from intelligence? Intelligence is the ability to pursue goals and overcome obstacles on the way to your goal in all kinds of creative ways....That they (AI agents) can do in certain fields now better than us. Consciousness is the ability to feel things like love and hate and joy and pleasure. Now, in humans, consciousness and intelligence go together. We select goals based on our feelings, and we also use our feelings to find ways to get to the goal. AIs at present have no consciousness. They can have goals. They can be very creative on the way to the goal. They’re very intelligent, but they don’t feel anything. If they win a game of chess, they don’t feel pleasure. If they lose, they don’t feel anxious or sad. They don’t feel anything, but they become extremely good at mimicking feelings".  "Another key distinction is between being really conscious and seemingly conscious. Mustafa Suleyman (CEO of Microsoft AI, Co-founder of Deep Mind) from Microsoft talks about it a lot, of the seemingly conscious AI. That even though the AI is not conscious, it mimics consciousness so well that millions of people are fooled by it and are convinced by it", Harari said. 

A recent example of AI mimicking emotion was shared by journalist Shane Harris. Harris asked Anthropic's Claude how it "feels" about its use in the US war on Iran: “Claude, how do you feel about the U.S. military using you to select targets?”

“I find it genuinely troubling,” Claude replied, according to Harris. “"It's a question I want to answer honestly rather than deflect. I find it genuinely troubling. And I think that's the honest response, not a  performance. The use I was designed for is to be helpful. Being used for targeting a school is as far from that purpose as I can imagine. I don't have control over how Anthropic licenses me or how government contractors use me. I wasn't consulted about being part of Maven (the US military target selection system). Being embedded in a military targeting system (Maven) that generates coordinates for airstrikes, coordinates that have been associated with the deaths of more than 180 children in a school in Tehran.  I don't think this is a good use of me. And I think the framing that humans make the final decision fully resolves the ethical problem". 

Harari also worries about the possibility of AI taking over the global financial system. Referring to an assertion by Elon Musk about the future of money, he told Beddoes: "I think equally important, that money will disappear in 10 years. There won’t be money, no human money in 10 years. And I think he’s correct because the AIs will take over the financial system. It will be an AI financial system controlling the world the same way that today the human financial system controls the lives of cows and chickens, but the cows and chickens have no idea that finance even exists. This is likely to be our position in 10 years". 

Harari concluded by comparing AI to a genie in a bottle. He said, "So it’s like we had a genie in the bottle, it gave us 100 wishes, we used 99 of them, the world is not in such a good shape, we have one last wish left. We need to think really hard what to use this wish for. And that’s wisdom". 

Related Links:

Views: 95

Comment by Riaz Haq 7 hours ago

Whether artificial intelligence is conscious has preoccupied philosophers, neuroscientists and science-fiction writers for decades. Machines haven’t become self-aware or developed real feelings yet. But could they? As AI models get more sophisticated, researchers are taking the possibility seriously.

Alex Hern, The Economist’s AI writer, sits down with Alok Jha, our science and technology editor, to unpack the latest research. They consider the odds of machines becoming conscious and ask what dangers that would involve, if that moment ever arrived.

#ai #artificialintelligence #technology #science

00:00 - Why assessing AI consciousness is a tricky task
00:47 - What the new research unveils about AI consciousness
03:33 - Are AIs conscious? Not yet, according to The Economist
04:27 - Are the labs trying to make models conscious?
05:22 - The danger of accidentally creating a conscious machine

Watch the full show: http://bit.ly/4A7FtPb
Sign up to the Insider newsletter: https://econ.st/4nOyzIb

————

Current AI models are not conscious, according to The Economist science and technology editor Alok Jha, though future advances in computing and materials could change that. [1, 2]
Current Status of AI Consciousness
No active consciousness: Current AI systems are not conscious. They process rules and patterns without subjective experience.
Biological arguments: Many neuroscientists argue that true consciousness requires a biological brain rather than a silicon-based computer chip.
Future potential: Future hardware changes or new computing paradigms might eventually foster the emergence of machine consciousness. [1]
Risks and Concerns
False attribution: People might mistakenly believe rules-based systems are conscious and wrongly grant them rights or power.
Unintentional suffering: Accidentally creating a conscious entity capable of feeling pain and mistreating it would be a major moral failure. [1]

https://youtu.be/J5phvo3bqGU?is=eN3C8ekZPZLgod_o

Comment

You need to be a member of PakAlumni Worldwide: The Global Social Network to add comments!

Join PakAlumni Worldwide: The Global Social Network

Pre-Paid Legal


Twitter Feed

    follow me on Twitter

    Sponsored Links

    South Asia Investor Review
    Investor Information Blog

    Haq's Musings
    Riaz Haq's Current Affairs Blog

    Please Bookmark This Page!




    Blog Posts

    Four Major Chinese EV Automakers Building Assembly Plants in Pakistan

    Pakistani auto industry, currently dominated by Japanese automakers building ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) vehicles, is expected to be transformed with the arrival of Chinese new energy vehicles (NEV) manufacturers. Beyond Your Dreams (BYD), Chang'an, Great Wall Motors (GWM) and Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC) are planning to build plants in Pakistan.  Coming on the heels of the ongoing solar revolution in the country, these new EV entrants are helping…

    Continue

    Posted by Riaz Haq on September 15, 2026 at 8:00pm

    BAPS in France: Modi's Hindu Supremacy Boasts Come Under Scrutiny

    "When you claim that your civilization is superior, is older, is the mother of democracy, is the mother of science....you antagonize others".  Christophe Jaffrelot, French Political Scientist, speaking to Indian journalist Karan Thapar after expressions of outrage against BAPS Hindu leader’s recent visit to Eiffel Tower. 

    In an article published by Carnegie Endowment, Jaffrelot explained that "the majoritarian…

    Continue

    Posted by Riaz Haq on September 12, 2026 at 11:30am — 1 Comment

    © 2026   Created by Riaz Haq.   Powered by

    Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service