Geopolitics: Changing Dynamics of Pakistan's Ties to China and the US

Pakistan has long sought to balance its foreign policy between China and the United States through a pragmatic hedging strategy, gaining economic, military, and diplomatic benefits from both superpowers while maintaining strategic autonomy. But the relationship between Pakistan and China is not the same as the one between Pakistan and the United States. Pakistan's ties with China are strategic while those with the United States remain tactical and transactional. What has changed recently is that Pakistan is no longer waging war to help the United States as it did during the "Cold War" and the "War on Terror". Instead, Pakistan has emerged as a peacemaker between the US and Iran. 

Both China and US Are Courting Pakistan


In a piece titled "Pakistan's Great Game", French political scientist Christophe Jaffrelot has explained what he sees as Pakistan's "tactics and strategy" in dealing with the two superpowers. Here's a quote from Jaffrelot's recent article on the subject:  

"While Pakistan’s relationship with China is rooted in strategic logic, its relationship with the United States is more tactical in nature-and has been since the 1950s, when General Ayub Khan boasted of his ability to play "one lion against another" (referring to the United States and the USSR at the start of the Cold War). In its dealings with the United States, Pakistan has played the role of intermediary, or even "client," within a typical clientelist framework: in exchange for the services Islamabad provided to Washington, the United States provided Pakistan with substantial aid and agreed to sell it sophisticated weapons, and even to train its officers-a privilege greatly appreciated.....  The first major service rendered by the Pakistanis to the Americans was none other than the intermediary role played by General Yahya Khan vis-à-vis Chairman Mao in the early 1970s, which led to the United States’ recognition of the People’s Republic of China. Over the following decade, Pakistan served as an intermediary between Washington and the mujahideen tasked with driving the Soviets out of Afghanistan. And in the 2000s, Pakistan was tasked by Washington with hunting down al-Qaeda-with much more mixed success this time, as evidenced by the discovery of bin Laden’s hideout in Abbottabad in 2011". 

Pakistan PM Sharif (L) with Chinese President Xi


Jaffrelot goes on to say that the United States has repeatedly proved to be an unreliable partner of the South Asia nation.  "Whenever the United States no longer needed Pakistan-or even felt betrayed by it-it abandoned the country or even imposed sanctions on it", he writes. 

More recently, Pakistan's usefulness to the US has once again become obvious,  no longer to wage war against the USSR or terrorism, but to make peace with Iran, Jaffrelot says. 

"In 2026, Pakistan appears useful once again, no longer to wage war against the USSR or terrorism, but to make peace. Each time, these glorious episodes were very short-lived and came to an end due to criticism of the Pakistani regime’s authoritarianism - with the military always remaining in power, even when civilians are in the forefront; its ties to Islamists accused of terrorist activities - particularly in India; or accusations of nuclear proliferation. Will the same be true tomorrow, once the war in Iran is over and the United States no longer needs Pakistan?  Everything will, of course, depend on the outcome of the conflict and the role Pakistan plays in resolving it-for it will be harder to send Islamabad back home if the world owes it something resembling peace". 

Oval Office Photo: L to R: VP JD Vance, President Trump, PM Sharif, FM Munir & Sec of State Rubio

Jaffrelot argues that "Pakistan has reached a turning point through the recognition of its military capabilities, as reflected in the mutual defense agreement it signed with Saudi Arabia...... Last June, Kaja Kallas, the EU Vice President in charge of the Union’s international relations, on the occasion of the 8th Strategic Dialogue between Pakistan and the European Union in Islamabad, thanked Pakistan-"a major regional power"-for its efforts in helping to avert an "all-out war" in the Middle East.  Jaffrelot now sees Pakistan's new role as a "net security provider" in West Asia and the Middle East.

He writes: "A more significant factor entering the equation relates to regional balances of power: Pakistan will continue to serve as a "net security provider" for Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia if those countries continue to fear the rise of Israel - a potential regional hegemon - and if they doubt Washington’s intentions, or even its mere reliability. There is no doubt that Pakistan itself will do everything in its power to prevent Israel from asserting itself on the regional stage and to gain influence over Iran-which is what the Israeli-American plan for regime change in Iran might have entailed. At the very least, faced with the risk of Israeli hegemony based on force and repeated military interventions, Pakistan could emerge as the architect of a resistance front bringing together not only Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt, but also Iran".  



Jaffrelot expects India to continue its decade-long campaign to isolate Pakistan internationally. "India’s ability to isolate Pakistan-the strategy Narendra Modi has pursued for more than a decade-is another important variable, though its significance may be undermined by New Delhi’s drift toward authoritarianism and ethnocracy, as well as by the economic and social crisis threatening the country", according to Jaffrelot. 

Related Links:

Haq's Musings

South Asia Investor Review

Pakistan Downs India's French Rafale Jets in a Major Aerial Battle

Has Modi Succeeded Diplomatically or Militarily Against Pakistan Af...

Pakistan-Saudi Defense Pact

Pakistan's Key Role in US-Iran Ceasefire

Has Modi Succeeded Militarily or Diplomatically in Isolating Pakist...

China, Pakistan to "Further Deepen and Expand" Ties

Modi's India: A Paper Elephant?

Pahalgam Attack: Why is the Indian Media Not Asking Hard Questions?

Ukraine's Lesson For Pakistan: Never Give Up Nukes!

Pakistan Economy Nears Trillion Dollars

Pakistan's Sea-Based Second Strike Capability

Riaz Haq Youtube Channel

VPOS Youtube Channel

Views: 24

Comment by Riaz Haq 3 hours ago

farrukh saleem
@SaleemFarrukh
1. Washington has rediscovered Pakistan.
2. The White House needs our diplomatic reach.
3. The Pentagon needs GHQ.
4. Centcom needs our geography.
5. Treasury is weighing a $10 billion backstop.
6. This is not aid.
7. This is a strategic reset.
8. The question: will Islamabad convert relevance into structure — or take the cash and let the moment pass, again?
My column in
@thenews
today.

https://x.com/SaleemFarrukh/status/2083778256575115499?s=20
------------------

farrukh saleem
@SaleemFarrukh
This is not Washington instead of Beijing.
The objective is productive relations with the US alongside the strategic partnership with China.
Pakistan doesn't need to choose. It needs to convert relevance into leverage — with both.
My column:
Washington’s return
Opinion
By Dr Farrukh Saleem
August 02, 2026
📷
📷
📷An airview of Pentagon. —AFP/File
Attention: Washington has rediscovered Islamabad’s strategic utility. The White House needs Pakistan’s diplomatic reach. The Pentagon sees GHQ as central to regional stability. Centcom needs Pakistan’s geography, military coordination and operational access across a volatile region. The US Department of Treasury is looking into a $10 billion Exchange Stabilisation Fund-linked facility. Members of the US Congress are arriving at GHQ. These are not isolated events.

Red alert: This is a strategic reset.

The reset is being driven by geography. Pakistan borders Iran. Pakistan sits next to Afghanistan. Pakistan is connected to China. Pakistan has access to the Arabian Sea. Pakistan has military relations across the Gulf. Pakistan can speak to Washington, Tehran, Riyadh, Ankara, Beijing and Doha.

Cold truth: There isn’t a country that occupies this diplomatic intersection.

Washington has rediscovered Pakistan’s relevance. Islamabad must now decide what to do with that relevance. For seven decades, Pakistan has repeatedly converted geopolitical importance into temporary financial relief. The pattern is clear: Military aid. Budgetary support. Coalition Support Funds. IMF influence. Debt rescheduling. Yes, the money arrived – and the moment passed. The structure remained unchanged.

For Washington, Pakistan offers three strategic assets: access, influence and regional reach. For Islamabad, Washington offers four economic advantages: capital, technology, markets and financial credibility.

For Pakistan, the next move is conversion: strategic relevance into measurable economic gains.

Pakistan should negotiate for outcomes that change the structure of the economy: preferential access for textiles, engineering goods and IT services; US equity in copper refining and downstream industries around Reko Diq; technology partnerships in AI, cloud computing and semiconductors; long-term financing for energy storage, transmission and gas exploration; and a $10 billion reserve backstop that lowers the sovereign risk premium.

Pakistan should ask Centcom for a joint US-Pakistan AI task force, embedded in an existing military relationship, focused on border security, counter-terrorism and infrastructure protection (template: Task Force Talon Synapse). Pakistan should ask Washington for four things: a joint counter-drone centre; a US-backed regional role for NLC; an Army Materiel Command-linked predictive-logistics platform; and “beta partner” access to the Pentagon’s innovation pipeline.

GHQ should also ask for a dedicated Section 333 Building Partner Capacity funding line, a seat in Centcom’s Counter-Threat Finance working group and a permanent Pakistani staff-officer billet inside Centcom headquarters at MacDill. GHQ should propose that Rawalpindi become Centcom’s South Asian centre for battlefield trauma, prosthetics, rehabilitation and disaster medicine. Pakistan should also seek advice from US asset managers to diversify Fauji Foundation and Army Welfare Trust assets into dollar-denominated investments.

Plain fact: US-Pakistan goods trade is worth less than $9 billion a year. US-


https://x.com/SaleemFarrukh/status/2083936184557089025?s=20

Comment

You need to be a member of PakAlumni Worldwide: The Global Social Network to add comments!

Join PakAlumni Worldwide: The Global Social Network

Pre-Paid Legal


Twitter Feed

    follow me on Twitter

    Sponsored Links

    South Asia Investor Review
    Investor Information Blog

    Haq's Musings
    Riaz Haq's Current Affairs Blog

    Please Bookmark This Page!




    Blog Posts

    Geopolitics: Changing Dynamics of Pakistan's Ties to China and the US

    Pakistan has long sought to balance its foreign policy between China and the United States through a pragmatic hedging strategy, gaining economic, military, and diplomatic benefits from both superpowers while maintaining strategic autonomy. But the relationship between Pakistan and China is not the same as the one between Pakistan and the United States. Pakistan's ties with China are strategic while those with the United States remain tactical and transactional. What…

    Continue

    Posted by Riaz Haq on August 1, 2026 at 1:00pm — 1 Comment

    AI Battle: A Chinese AI Model Fights Off OpenAI's Rogue Agent

    Rogue AI agents are no longer just the stuff of science fiction. When an OpenAI rogue agent launched a cyber attack against AI startup Hugging Face this month, the company fought fire with fire, using an open-source Chinese AI model to defend against it. 



    During a test in a sandbox, an OpenAI autonomous agent managed to sneak out and attack a website operated by HuggingFace, an AI startup based in New York City.…

    Continue

    Posted by Riaz Haq on July 26, 2026 at 9:33pm — 9 Comments

    © 2026   Created by Riaz Haq.   Powered by

    Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service